In addition to the Obama win, there was another
outcome of the 2012 Elections that caused much debate in the press: Virginia
passed a law limiting the power of eminent domain. This led to many people
asking, "What is eminent domain?"
Eminent domain is "the power to take private
property for public use by a state, municipality, or private person or
corporation authorized to exercise functions of public character, following the
payment of just compensation to the owner of that property." It is an
action of the state to seize private property without the owner’s consent by
providing just compensation. The rule is normally applied when building
highways, train tracks or public property for the benefit of a community and
the action is protected by the US Constitution.
In general, to exercise the power of eminent domain, the government must prove that the four elements set forth in the Fifth Amendment are present: (1) private property (2) must be taken (3) for public use (4) and with just compensation. These elements have been interpreted broadly.
In general, to exercise the power of eminent domain, the government must prove that the four elements set forth in the Fifth Amendment are present: (1) private property (2) must be taken (3) for public use (4) and with just compensation. These elements have been interpreted broadly.
However, the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that
the Constitution grants the government the right to take private
property – homes, businesses, and other property – and sell or give it to
another private entity if jobs and taxes could be generated (Kelo versus City
of New London, Connecticut, 2005). The eminent domain attorney for the case
pressed the high court to vote in favor of economic development projects
that create jobs, increases taxes and other revenue, and revitalizes a
depressed or blighted area that qualifies as “public use.” The courts
ruled that private economic development is a public use under the Fifth
Amendment.
The VA amendment makes it so that private property
can only be taken for a public use - it cannot be taken and given to another
private landowner, even if the transfer would spur economic development. Supporters
of the amendment claimed that that changes are necessary because the 2005 ruling gave the government too much power to use eminent domain for private
economic development projects.
Opposers, both Republicans and Democrats alike, were against the amendment as it may force
the state government and municipalities to pay more money for what they claim
are appropriate uses of eminent domain. The amendment may cost both over tens
of millions of dollars for both the local and state governments. Even with the opposition, the amendment passed with flying colors,
passing with 75 percent of the voters for the limits on eminent domain - the law will go into effect on Jan 1, 2013.
The 2005
Kelo decision informed the public about eminent domain abuse. Since the
decision, 44 other states have made amendments to
their constitutions to reduce the government’s power to take private property
though eminent domain.
No comments:
Post a Comment